| As everyone knows, the Geo Metro convertible had a more peppy transmission than the other Geo Metros. Since "peppiness" wasn't what I was shooting for | |||||||
| I pulled the 4.39 ratio tranny out of my convertible and replaced it with a tranny from a 1992 XFI (you can see the car on my parts car page). A few people | |||||||
| warned me that the XFI tranny was going to be geared too low and it would be a pain in the butt to drive as well as actually cost me mileage. This really didn't | |||||||
| make sense to me since I wanted to get the lowest possible RPMs while cruising. Well, after installing the tranny I'm only turning 2200 RPMs @ 55 MPH | |||||||
| instead of the 2500 I used to be turning (a 14% drop) the car feels quite sluggish. It is OK for cruising but it kind of gets on my nerves for around town driving. | |||||||
| As far as mileage, it looks as though I gained about 4 MPG (from 45 up to 49 MPG). FWIW, I was worried a bit about this before installing the tranny but the table | |||||||
| below shows that the 4th gear in the XFI tranny was about the same as 5th gear in the convertible. This meant that if I didn't like | |||||||
| the install I could just drive around in 4th gear and it would be like nothing had changed. | |||||||
| So, would I do it again? Sure, but I bet I will be pulling the tranny out if I ever sell the car (no one else would ever want to drive it like this). | |||||||
| 1.3 Swift to mid year '95 | 98-01 1.3 Metro | XFI | 1.3 Swift mid year '95+ | GT, GTI, up to 95 Metro | Vert, 96+ Metro | ||
| Final Drive | 3.52 | 3.79 | 3.85 | 3.95 | 4.10 | 4.39 | |
| 1st | 3.416 | 12.024 | 12.947 | 13.152 | 13.493 | 14.006 | 14.996 |
| 2nd | 1.894 | 6.667 | 7.178 | 7.292 | 7.481 | 7.765 | 8.315 |
| 3rd | 1.280 | 4.506 | 4.851 | 4.928 | 5.056 | 5.248 | 5.619 |
| 4th | 0.914 | 3.217 | 3.464 | 3.519 | 3.610 | 3.747 | 4.012 |
| 5th | 0.757 | 2.665 | 2.869 | 2.914 | 2.990 | 3.104 | 3.323 |